Native American Nicolas Aldana & Emilio Aguinaldo

PHILIPPINE WAR 1899 – 1902

February 4, 1899 – Considered the start of the Philippine War (1899-1902) when a Filipino was shot by an American sentry as he crossed Silencio Street, Sta. Mesa, Manila. 

February 5-6 1899 – Battle of Manila – Philippine War 1899-1902.  Ill-equipped Army of Liberation was no match to the superior arms of the Americans. Aguinaldo’s army was split into. He was with the group north of Manila while Pio Del Pilar and others retreated to the South.

April 28, 1899 – Aguinaldo sent Col. Manuel Arguelles, Gen. Antonio Luna’s Chief of Staff as a special commissioner to seek a truce and possible end of hostilities. Otis wanted unconditional surrender. Here is where Otis was criticized for his firm stand. But Otis claimed he has every reason to demand unconditional surrender. Aguinaldo was buying time. Arguelles was in fact trying to buy arms from Japan while he was in Manila.

May 2, 1899 –  Aguinaldo’s representatives proposed a three-month cease-fire, couched in language which required Otis to acknowledge the Philippine Republic as a sovereign nation. Otis refused the truce on those terms, but gave the delegate a copy of President McKinley’s plan for a Philippine civil government, which would include an advisory council and judiciary selected from Americans and Filipinos.[Note 2]

Aguinaldo’s delegates were won over. Aguinaldo’s cabinet headed by hard-liner Apolinario Mabini was ousted and replaced with a “Peace cabinet” headed by Pedro Paterno, which sent the delegates back to Manila to discuss surrender terms with Otis.

May 13, 1899 – Aguinaldo again sent another peace commission to include Gen.Gregorio Del Pilar, Gracio Gonzazo, a member of Aguinaldo’s cabinet, Lt. Col. Alberto Barretto, military advocate, & Maj. Zialcita, a member of Aguinaldo’s staff. Additional members of the delegation were Florentino Torres, Pablo Ocampo and Theodore Yanco, residents of Manila.

General Luna who against the peace negotiations, arrested the delegates and Paterno’s cabinet. He then restored Mabini and the hardliners. Negotiations collapsed, and Otis resumed his offensive.

Felipe Buencamino saw it was useless to fight and DEFECTED to the Americans taking P90,000.00 of the fledgling republic’s funds.

This is in reference to the movie “HENERAL LUNA” (2015).

June 5, 1899 – Gen. Antonio Luna was assassinated in Cabanatuan. Antonio Luna was 31 yrs. old FROM a wealthy criollo family in ILOCOS NORTE. “His equally hotheaded brother the painter Juan Luna had killed his wife for allegedly committing adultery.”

So Antonio, a soldier, was not really an ideal husband material if his brother Juan, a painter, killed the wife. From page 156 & 157 from Karnow’s book “In Our Image”. (March 1990).

HERE IS THE MYSTERY: Gen. Gregorio Del Pilar the “Boy General” only 24 years old PRESIDED OVER THE TORTURE OF GEN. ANTONIO LUNA’S AIDES. WHY??!! See: Page 158 & 159 from Karnow’s book “In Our Image” (March 1990).

According to Karnow’s book, two Illustrados, Pedro Paterno and Felipe Buencamino were in favor of making a deal with the Americans, something Gen. A. Luna would never agree.

It appears from this account, Aguinaldo gave “his discreet approval” to Luna’s assassination on June 5.

In another book, Aguinaldo reputedly told his captor Funston the issue with Luna boiled down, “either Luna would kill him (Aguinaldo) or Aguinaldo would kill Luna.” P. 136.

But then again, after Luna was killed, why didn’t Aguinaldo resumed peace negotiations with the Americans? Later after his capture Aguinaldo would pledge allegiance to the U.S. rather quickly on April 1, 1901, eight (8) days after his capture.  

Reference: “In Our Image: America’s Empire in the Philippines by Stanley Karnow (Author) ISBN-13: 978-0345328168 ISBN-10: 0345328167

 In the meantime, back in the South . . .

June 10, 1899 – Start of operation towards Las Piñas. (See Photos)

June 12, 1899 – Gen. Henry W. Lawton sets up HQ in Las Piñas.

June 13, 1899 – Battle of Zapote River Bridge. It was the second biggest battle of the Philippine War next to the Battle of Manila Feb. 5 & 6, 1899. Gen. Lawton called the battle of Zapote Bridge “A beautiful battle.”

The Battle of Zapote Bridge also known as the Battle of Zapote River was fought on June 13, 1899 between 3,000 American soldiers and 5,000 Filipinos.

It was the Battle of Zapote Bridge that earned the respect of General Henry Ware Lawton, whose dispatches invariably carried a sympathetic note of the heroism displayed by Filipinos fighting for their freedom.

The Battle was called the “Liveliest Engagement of the War.”

The New York Times reported that it [the Filipino Army] was “the largest and best organized body of men which had yet met American troops.” 

After the Battle of Zapote Bridge, everything went downhill for the Army of Liberation (Aguinaldo and the Hacienderos (future oligarchs of the Philippines).

    ====================================

Aug. 1, 1899 – Artist’s sketch: “Municipal Home-Rule for the Filipinos/Organizing the Local Government at Las Piñas. The Interpreter explaining American Institutions to the newly elected President. — Drawn from Life by William Bengough.” Harper’s Weekly – History of the War in the Philippines Aug. 1, 1899.

March 23, 1901 – Gen. Emilio Aguinaldo was captured in Palanan, Isabela.

April 1, 1901 – Emilio Aguinaldo pledge allegiance to the United States of America.

July 13, 1901 – Nicolas Aldana, Isaac Antonio, Prudencio Santiago, and Estanislao Quilatan were charged for an alleged crime committed in the month Jan. 1901, before a military commission at the HQ Dept. of Southern Luzon, Lt. Col. John G. Leefe, presiding and Capt. Palmer E. Pierce judge-advocate. Counsel for the accused, if any, was not named.

November 7, 1901 – The accused were found guilty and General Orders No. 344 was issued sentencing the four to death by hanging. Major Gen. Adna R. Chafee confirmed the sentence.

December 12, 1901 – Nicolas Aldana, a landowner with the help of three more accomplices namely: Isaac Antonio, Prudencio Santiago, and Estanislao Quilatan were executed in Cavite for murder of a newspaper boy.

July 6, 1902 – AGUINALDO IS GIVEN LIBERTY, BUT FEARS HAND OF ASSASSIN
http://cdnc(DOT) ucr.edu/cgi-bin/cdnc?a=d&d=SFC19020707.2.9#
San Francisco Call, Volume 87, Number 37, 7 July 1902

PHOTOS

Las Piñas - Organizing local government in Las Pinas Aug. 1899 “Municipal Home-Rule for the Filipinos/Organizing the Local Government at Las Piñas. The Interpreter explaining American Institutions to the newly elected President.—Drawn from Life by William Bengough.”   Harper’s Weekly – History of the War in the Philippines Aug. 1, 1899.

 [Seated are Brig. Gen. Frederick D. Grant; Dean C. Worcester, Philippines Commissioner, and Maj. Gen. Henry W. Lawton. Standing behind Gen. Grant is Calixto Laral, President, and, to his left, Paulo Ellanigat, Vice-President. The American officials all have chairs. Only one Filipino is seated. The newly elected president is standing]. 

Maj. Gen. Henry Ware Lawton in Las Piñas Church. The view facing south towards Zapote,

Above: June 12, 1899 – Gen. Henry W. Lawton sets up HQ in Las Piñas Church.

Las Piñas Church, used as headquarters by Maj. Gen. Henry Lawton. - June 10-12, 1899 Above:Las Piñas Church: Home of the only Bamboo Organ in the World. Photo take onJune 10, 1899, the Start of operation towards Las Piñas. 

Philippine War 1899 - 1902 - Zapote River Bridge site of the Battle on 13 June 1899

Above: Zapote River Bridge as it stood after the Battle on 13 June 1899. It was the second biggest battle of the Philippine War next to the Battle of Manila Feb. 5 & 6, 1899. Gen. Lawton called the battle of Zapote Bridge “A beautiful battle.”

Blog - Nicolas Aldana - Hearing 1901 p.1

Blog - Nicolas Aldana - Hearing 1901 p.2

About the charges, trial and execution of Nicolas Aldana, Isaac Antonio, Prudencio Santiago & Estanislao Quilatan, the way the indictment and sentence were written gave so many red flags to indicate this was politically motivated to facilitate the transition period. The American officers were reluctant to condemn these men to death to accommodate what was believed would end the Philippine War.

So much hopes were pinned on Aguinaldo’s cooperation. The Americans believe with Aguinaldo’s pledge of allegiance after acceding to his terms, the resistance to the Benevolent Assimilation would end.

The indictment or hearing left so many ‘red flags.” Here are some: 

1.) There was no counsel for the defendants.

2.) The accused were charged with MURDER that was committed sometime in the WHOLE MONTH of January 1901. There was no specific date.

3.) Lack of motive – My great grandfather was the husband of a land owner Ana Quilatan. During the Spanish regime, only full blooded Spaniards either born in Spain or in the Philippines could own real estate. Creoles or half-Spanish could only lease and manage farm lands as was the case of Dr. Jose Rizal’s family.

Why would a husband of a landowner rob and kill a newspaper boy?

4.) The second victim was unknown.

5.) The condemned were not given the chance to appeal the verdict and were executed 35 days after they were allegedly found guilty on 7 Nov. 1901.

6.) The Local Government in Las Piñas was already established as early as 1 Aug. 1899. Why would Nicolas Aldana and others continue to resist AFTER the capture of Aguinaldo? Did Aguinaldo feel guilty pledging allegiance to the U.S. This would mean Nicolas Aldana and others never swore allegiance to the U.S.

7.) The Brigandage Act that interpreted all acts of armed resistance to American rule as banditry wasn’t made into law until Nov. 12, 1902, exactly eleven (11) months AFTER my great grandfather’s execution.

    ================================

** “The army used the 1863 General Orders 100 (signed into law by Abraham Lincoln to govern the actions of Union soldiers in wartime) as legal authorization for governing the Philippines. As long as Filipinos did not resist military authority, support the insurgents, or take up arms, they could expect friendly treatment.
For those who actively opposed the United States, however, the order prescribed cash fines, confiscation or destruction of property, summary imprisonment, relocation, capture of hostages, and execution of guerrillas who did not observe the laws and customs of war.” 

Folly in the Philippines
By Rod Paschall | Published: August 10, 2010 at 4:41 pm

Arthur MacArthur in the Philippines 1901

http://www.historynet.com/arthur-macarthur?pid=862 

From MHQ The Military Quarterly History Magazine
Autumn 2010 Issue 

================================ 

 Below a photocopy documenting of one of the few remaining properties of Ana Quilatan, the wife of Nicolas Aldana. During the Spanish regime, only pure blooded Spaniards were allowed to own real estate. Mestizos usually half Chinese and half Spaniards could only lease farmlands they operate from the Dominicans as was the case of Dr. Jose Rizal’s parents. Land Survey for Heirs of Ana Quilatan p2

Maj. Gen. Adna R. Chaffee
Maj. Gen. Adna R. Chaffee

ARTICLE: AGUINALDO IS GIVEN LIBERTY, BUT FEARS HAND OF ASSASSIN

http://cdnc.ucr.edu/cgi-bin/cdnc?a=d&d=SFC19020707.2.9#

http://cdnc.ucr.edu/cgi-bin/cdnc?a=d&d=SFC19020707.2.9&e=——-en–20–1–txt-txIN——–1

San Francisco Call, Volume 87, Number 37, 7 July 1902

Filipino Leader Desires Bodyguard of Soldiers.

Chaffee Meets Late Foe for First Time.

 Aguinaldo seek bodyguards of soldiers 07-22-1902

AGUINALDO IS GIVEN LIBERTY, BUT FEARS HAND OF ASSASSIN

http://cdnc.ucr.edu/cgi-bin/cdnc?a=d&d=SFC19020707.2.9#

San Francisco Call, Volume 87, Number 37, 7 July 1902

AGUINALDO IS GIVEN LIBERTY, BUT FEARS HAND OF ASSASSIN

Filipino Leader Desires Bodyguard of Soldiers. Chaffee Meets Late Foe for First Time.

MANILA, July 6.— As a result of the proclamation of amnesty on July 4, the guard of American soldiers has JL f JbjL been withdrawn from .the ! house in Which Aguinaldo ‘ ¦ lived in Manila, and Lieutenant Johnson, ‘Aguinaldo’s custodian, took the Filipino to-day to see General Chaffee. It was the first meeting between the American general and the leader of the Filipino revolution. Lieutenant William E. MacKinley of the Ninth Cavalry acted as interpreter. ¦ ¦ y 

Aguinaldo was told that he was free to go anywhere he pleased, and General Chaffee asked him if he had any complaint to make of American discourtesy or harshness. Aguinaldo replied that he had no such complaint, to make. He told General Chaffee that he ¦was going to visit friends at his home in Cavite Viejo, in Cavite province and inquired what protection the American authorities would afford him. He seemed to be afraid to venture out. . General Chaffee replied that “Aguinaldo would get the same protection as any, other citizen.”

“The former Filipino leader then asked General Chaffee to prevent the courts requiring: him to testify in civil suits. General Chaffee replied that he’ had no authority to grant this request, and advised Aguinaldo to make a social call upon acting Civil Governor Wright.

This Aguinaldo – said he would do, but he declared that he would go at night, as he was timid about appearing in the’ streets in daylight.“- ;

The release of the former Filipino leader has renewed speculation as to possible vengeance upon him by friends of Luna and his other enemies. Luna was a Filipino leader whom Aguinaldo caused to be killed in 1899. •

Comment: But Antonio Luna was from Ilocos Norte. For Aguinaldo to reach Cavite Viejo, Cavite (now Kawit, Cavite), he had to pass through Las Piñas the ancestral land of Nicolas Aldana and three others. 

Below is the map of Cavite, Morong & Manila During the Battle of Binakayan Nov. 9-11, 1896.Map of Cavite, Morong & Manila During the Battle of Binakayan Nov. 9-11, 1896

Emilio Aguinaldo
Emilio Aguinaldo

   

 

======================== 

OTHER NEWS:

ADMITS RHODE’S REPORT.

The court-martial trying Captain James A. Ryan of the Fifteenth Cavalry on the charge that he was unnecessarily severe with the natives of the province where he was stationed has admitted, for purposes of cross-examination, the entire report of Judge Rhode, which forms the basis of the charge against the captain. The order, convening the court disregarded all the’ allegations except the one of cruelty to. natives. . -• 

 

Judge Rhode has testified that he had no personal knowledge of the facts In the principal allegations, and has declined to give the names of his informants. He admitted and then denied the right of the* defense to require an answer to the question as to where he obtained his information. . • ;r’i.; ; -K

The cross-examination of Major Cornelius; Gardener, Governor of Tayabas province.’ Luzon, by the board Which has been Investigating, the charges of cruelty, etc/, brought by the major against American officers and has been completed. The board had again formally demanded the production by- Major Gardener of testimony as to . the alleged” ho*tHity of f lie- military’ authoritiM : in th» Philippines to the. civil government. Major, Gardener has promised to answer this demand on July 7. Ho ‘testified that he had not intended to reflect upon th* fair)pp3s of the. court, and that the recorder had. not, to his knowledge. Interfered -with, his witnesses. ¦

SULTAN GROWS : DEFIANT.

J i The Sultan of Bacolod. Mindanao, haa sent: an Insultingly -worded letter to the commander of the American expedition ‘to Lano Lano, in Mindanao, in which. h« threatens to begin offensive operations in August. The Sultan’ is at present strengthening his position. Captain John H. Shollenberger of th*” Tenth Infantry committed suicide by shooting at Iligan, on the island of Mindanao, July 4. He was despondent.. Second Lieutenant Thomas Ryan of the Philippine scouts’ also committed suicide .by shooting, in the interior of the Island of Mindanao on ¦ June 1$. ¦ i – A number, of the former followers of the insurgent general Lukban, who”, operated and was finally captured in the. Island of Sanaar, were examined here on the charge of misappropriation of revolutionary funds. General Chaffee has permitted Lukban to go through the captured insurgent archives in Manila for the purpose of obtaining documents to show the innocence of his’ followers.

AMERICAN AND FILIPINO LEADr ERS WHO HAVE JUST HAD THEIR FIRST MEETING. 

 

WWII in the Philippines: Medal of Honor Recipients v. 50 Richest “Filipinos” of 2015

There were 51 Medal of Honor recipients who earned the distinction defending and liberating the Philippines in WWII. Of these, thirty-one (31) were awarded posthumously. Because Japanese collaborators retained power even after WWII, few Filipinos and even Americans know about the heroism and sacrifices of these men. 1st Lt. Alexander R. Nininger, Jr. “A” Co. 57th Infantry, Philippine Scouts, US Army, was the first American soldier to win the Congressional Medal of Honor in WWII but his name and

 

exploits is virtually unknown in the U.S. and in the Philippines.

List of WWII Medal of Honor Recipients - Defense and Liberation of the Philippines v. 4-26-19 p1List of WWII Medal of Honor Recipients - Defense and Liberation of the Philippines v. 4-26-19 p2

 

Seventy years after the end of WWII, on 26 Aug. 2015, Forbes Magazine listed the 50 richest “Filipinos” whose combined net worth totaled $73.1 billion. Yet none of them has been credited with any invention, development or discovery with which they could associate their wealth. Remember after WWII everyone in the Philippines was poor.

51 WWII MOH in the Philippines v. 50 Richest in the Philippines 2015 p2

 WHAT IT MEANS TO BE POOR IN THE PHILIPPINES  Living in a Garbage Dump; the “Stockholm-Manila Syndrome” (Bienvenido Macario, USA, 11/12/15 7:05 am) http://waisworld.org/go.jsp?id=02a&objectType=post&o=100109&objectTypeId=79903&topicId=17

This is for the heads of state of 21 member-countries going to the APEC summit in the Philippines on November 18 and 19, 2015.

The Philippines is very rich in natural resources. In 1972 the population was around 38 million. We used to say: “Stick a broom anywhere in the ground and it will grow back and yield a-plenty.” (Magtapon ka ng binhi kahit saan tutubo at mamumunga.)

Fast forward to…today. In the Philippines people are eating food they dig out of the garbage. Other than taking one’s own life, the poor in the Philippines have three choices: 1) Leave the country. 2) Work as a prostitute or lead a life of crime. 3) Eat garbage, literally.

These are the best approaches to philanthropy in the Philippines, in my opinion. Notice they are not Americans.Uploaded on Sep 3, 2009 

“When Briton Jane Walker first saw children rummaging through trash heaps while on a trip to the Philippines in 1996, she decided to do something about it. Employing about 100 people, Walker helps improve the lives of thousands of children and their families who otherwise would be forced to eke out a living picking through Manila’s garbage dumps.

Jennifer Glasse reports.” Garbage Dump Philanthropist Helps Thousands in Philippines Escape Poverty https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6_9FZG1JyHQ

How can the International community allow the 50 richest “Filipinos” to continue amassing so much wealth while majority of the natives of the Philippines are starving and reduced to eating garbage?

 

Another item, from 2012: “Having to give birth to your children on a rubbish dump is squalor that shocks. The only anchor of hope on a burning Philippine refuse tip is the priest and SVD missionary Fr. Heinz Kulüke from Germany.”

Living on a Philippine rubbish dump

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=heVMnceNJS8

Excerpt: “I buried 17 children myself in one week.”–Fr. Heinz Kuluke of Steyler Mission 

Most Filipinos fall into four types: 1) the brainwashed; 2) those with Stockholm syndrome; 3) the indifferent ones. 4) Combination of the three. I’m sure by now many Filipinos have the “Stockholm-Manila Syndrome” that started in 1946. It is a syndrome in which the victims, in this case Filipinos, end up loving their abusers the oligarchs, their politicians, the politicians’ relatives and friends, and the oligarchs’ cronies. And they hate the Americans and European missionaries. “Stockholm-Manila syndrome” is really the better designation for Filipinos instead of just “Stockholm syndrome,” which psychologists are more familiar with. Filipinos love their abusers–this is the “Stockholm Syndrome”–and hate those who genuinely care and help them–this is the “Manila Syndrome.”

 

JE comments:  The sad lot of the Philippines’ garbage-dump residents reminds one of Mexico’s “pepenadores,” who have developed a complex culture among the rubbish.  Bienvenido:  what is the Tagalog term to refer to these people? Is the “Manila Syndrome” limited to the Philippines?  Might we say there is a universal human trait to resent your benefactors–even when you are outwardly thankful?   

12 Rich 'Filipinos' in Forbes 2015 List 08-26-15

On The Issue of Collaborators in the Philippines During WWII – A Declassified CIA Report

10 December 2015

“Three things you cannot hide for long: the sun, the moon and the TRUTH.” – Buddha

INTRODUCTION: As WAIS Editor John Eipper noted in Francisco Ramirez’s 11 March 2015 post:

“JE comments: Yes, Philippines was still officially part of the US during WWII. We do know that our friend Bienvenido Macario has never recognized the legitimacy of the 1946 act (Treaty of Manila) which granted the Philippines its independence.

https://waisworld.org/go.jsp?id=02a&objectType=post&o=92120&objectTypeId=77257&topicId=165

Neither the Filipino people nor the American people were ever consulted through a referendum, if our parents and grandparents  wanted to be “on the road to independence” when the Philippine Independence Act of 1934 aka Commonwealth Act of 1934 was passed by the U.S. Congress.  

And again in 1946 there was no referendum held asking our parents, grandparents, the Filipino people if they wanted to GIVE UP THEIR AMERICAN NATIONALITY and SECEDE from the U.S. at a time when we needed U.S. administration and guidance the most when WWII just ended.

We are forced, to this day, to embrace treason!

We were forced to renege on our Pledge of Allegiance to the US flag. Remember that part of the oath: “one nation under God INDIVISIBLE with liberty and JUSTICE for ALL.”? Puerto Rico a U.S. territory acquired from Spain along with the Philippines and Guam held a referendum on 6 Nov. 2012.

Excerpt: “The September 18th referendum in Scotland should remind all Filipinos that our parents were not consulted when known Japanese collaborator Manuel A. Roxas sought independence that the US Senate illegally, irresponsibly and prematurely granted with the ratification of the 1946 Treaty of Manila on 22 October 1946. On Nov. 6, 2012, a referendum was held in Puerto Rico, and only a tiny 5.6 percent of Puerto Ricans voted for independence.”

From: “A Tale of Three Jesuses (Bienvenido Macario, USA) Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 1:43 PM”

https://waisworld.org/go.jsp?id=02a&objectType=post&o=88725&objectTypeId=75415&topicId=17

Scotland Referendum Aftermath; What About the Philippines? (Bienvenido Macario, USA) Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 6:08 AM

https://waisworld.org/go.jsp?id=02a&objectType=post&o=88420&objectTypeId=75246&topicId=17   ================================= 

Below is a declassified CIA report (13 pages) on the implications of Philippine Pres. Manuel Roxas’ granting of amnesty to accused collaborators in the Philippines.   Entitled:

POSSIBLE DEVELOPMENTS RESULTING FROM THE GRANTING OF AMNESTY TO ACCUSED COLLABORATORS IN THE PHILIPPINES

 This was published on 28 April 1948, three (3) months after Manuel Roxas, Sr. signed the general amnesty.

It was out of Roxas’ desire to escape justice, selfish ambition and the collective greed of the oligarchs that he opted to declare independence without consulting the people. Roxas’ decision is the single cause of the misery and suffering of millions of Filipinos especially the OFW’s to this day.
 

On page 1 the Summary page, the report says: “SEVERAL HUNDREDS OF FILIPINO GUERRILLAS OPPOSED TO THE OCCUPATION UNDER THEIR OWN OR US LEADERSHIP, ARE NOW IN CUSTODY AND SUBJECT TO PROSECUTION IN THE PHILIPPINE COURTS FOR ALLEGED ACTS OF VIOLENCE COMMITTED DURING THE WAR AS PART OF THEIR ANTI-JAPANESE AND ANTI-COLLABORATIONIST ACTIVITIES.

The ultimate effect of the amnesty, therefore, may well be detrimental to US interests in the Philippines in that

  • Elements suffering from its effects will believe themselves betrayed by the US and thus may reverse their previous loyalty to it; and
  • Former collaborationists who play on extreme Philippine nationalism and are themselves secretly or avowedly anti-US, are likely to achieve political and economic control.”

It now appears the Philippines was not liberated in WWII. This explains why the Philippines never celebrated VJ Day, MacArthur’s Leyte Landing or the Liberation of Manila. This is no longer acceptable.

Dedicated to MEGM.

Declassified CIA Report On the Impact of Granting Amnesty to Japanese Collaborators p.3
Declassified CIA Report On the Impact of Granting Amnesty to Japanese Collaborators p.3

Summary CIA Declassified Report - Possible Impact of the Granting Amnesty to Filipino collaborators 03-28-1948 v 4-11-2019

 

 

Summary Page - Declassified CIA Report on Implications of the Amnesty Granted to Collaborators in the Philippines - Macario Foundation1

 

CIA Report - Issue of Collaborators p1- Implications of Roxas' Amnesty 04-28-1948   CIA Report - Issue of Collaborators p2- Implications of Roxas' Amnesty 04-28-1948     CIA Report - Issue of Collaborators p3 - Implications of Roxas' Amnesty 04-28-1948     CIA Report - Issue of Collaborators p4 - Implications of Roxas' Amnesty 04-28-1948   CIA Report - Issue of Collaborators p5- Implications of Roxas' Amnesty 04-28-1948   CIA Report - Issue of Collaborators p6- Implications of Roxas' Amnesty 04-28-1948   CIA Report - Issue of Collaborators p7- Implications of Roxas' Amnesty 04-28-1948   CIA Report - Issue of Collaborators p8 - Implications of Roxas' Amnesty 04-28-1948   CIA Report - Issue of Collaborators p9 - Implications of Roxas' Amnesty 04-28-1948 CIA Report - Issue of Collaborators p10 - Implications of Roxas' Amnesty 04-28-1948   CIA Report - Issue of Collaborators p11 - Implications of Roxas' Amnesty 04-28-1948   CIA Report - Issue of Collaborators p12 - Implications of Roxas' Amnesty 04-28-1948
Notice - BS Aquino, Sr.'s House Under the Protection of the Japanese Imperial Forces

Above: An undeniable proof that Benigno Aquino, Sr. the grandfather of former Philippine Pres. Benigno Aquino III and father of Paul Aquino supposedly the geothermal magnate of the Philippines, was a Japanese collaborator during WWII.

A notice from Japanese Military Attache – Japanese Embassy (c. 1943)

OFFICE OF THE MILITARY ATTACHE

TO THE JAPANESE EMBASSY

Manila, Philippines

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:

This house belongs to His Excellency Benigno S. Aquino^, Speaker of the National Assembly. The same

should be respected and the occupants thereof given the necessary protections.

IMPERIAL JAPANESE FORCES

^ – The grandfather of Benigno Aquino III was a die-hard Japanese collaborator. The Philippines has never held any Liberation Day or VJ Day parade or any celebration whatsoever.Roxas with Col. N. Jimbo; Ickes asks Roxas his stand 07-22-1946 - Macario Foundation p1

Manuel A. Roxas (above with Col. Jimbo)  was a Brig. Gen. in the US Army when he collaborated with the Japanese during the occupation of the Philippines. To escape his war crime of treason under the Uniform Code of Military Justice and  trial by court martial, Manuel Roxas sought and amazingly enough was granted independence for the Philippines without consulting the Filipino people.

Philippines Mid-Term Elections: Duterte Allies Victorious (Bienvenido Macario, USA, 05/16/19 5:17 am)

https://waisworld.org/go.jsp?id=02a&objectType=post&o=124411&objectTypeId=90069&topicId=17

The Philippine mid-term elections were held on May 13th. The Liberal party to which former President Benigno Aquino III belongs, together with other independent parties, fielded the Ocho Derecho (spelled Otso Diretso) candidates for the Philippine Senate. 

Three Ocho Derecho (Straight Eight) candidates stand out:

1. Mar Roxas II (Mar Roxas), Aquino III’s anointed successor, who lost to Pres. Duterte in the 2016 presidential election. His grandfather was US Army Brig. Gen. Manuel A. Roxas, Sr. (Photo above)  who avoided the court martial for treason under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) by seeking independence under the 1946 Treaty of Manila.

2. Lorenzo Tañada III (Erin Tañada), the grandson of Lorenzo Tañada, Sr., Chief Prosecutor appointed by Manuel A. Roxas, Sr. Tañada prepared the list of suspected collaborators to be pardoned immediately after July 4, 1946. 

See: “Man-To-Man: Roxas Is Asked To Explain Stand”

by Harold L. Ickes

Pittsburgh Post-Gazette: Monday, July 22, 1946:

https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=bsMwAAAAIBAJ&sjid=ymkDAAAAIBAJ&pg=1774%2C3074145&dq=philippines%20collaborators%20tanada&hl=en&fbclid=IwAR3GHncGFvG-5wSe8R5pXVVwACzt6L1aIgpjDRYtgjtoLIXYNpRHbV5VClU

3. Benigno Aquino IV (Bam Aquino), another grandson of Benigno Aquino, Sr., the most dedicated and loyal Japanese collaborator of all. His father Paul Aquino was appointed to the PNOC-EDC privatization commission and sold the entire geothermal industry to the Lopezes at dirt-cheap prices. He then became the president of the privatized Energy Development Corporation (EDC). It was my late wife Ma. Elena G. Macario who discovered, assisted in the development and management of those geothermal resources in the Philippines while working for PNOC-EDC and before earning her MS in Petroleum Engineering at Stanford in 1991. On Dec. 10, 2010 she died penniless.

See: WAIS NEWS–Elena G. Macario (Bienvenido Macario) Dec. 13, 2010

https://waisworld.org/go.jsp?id=02a4&objectType=post&objectTypeId=52903&topicId=182

I am sure the oligarchs and the two million richest in the Philippines who never invented, developed or discovered anything even remotely associated to their obviously ill-gotten wealth, are desperately trying to find ways to explain where and how they managed to amass such an obscene amount of wealth. One way is money laundering. And my late wife’s accomplishments are the perfect target. 

I digress.

None of the Ocho Derecho candidates were elected to the Senate.

JE comments:  Happy to hear from one of our dearest colleagues, veteran WAISer Bienvenido Macario.  Duterte’s allies won resounding victories in the mid-term elections.  Bienvenido, is Duterte really that popular?  I know he’s good at summary executions and um, “outspokenness,” but has he brought any real progress to the Philippines?

=============

Just two (2) months after the Philippines was granted independence, on Sept. 4, 1946,  The New Times published an article saying that former puppet President Jose P. Laurel called Roxas a collaborator.

The Philippines was only liberated in the military sense. In every other sense, the Japanese collaborators retained effective control of the Philippine Islands, an abandoned US territory.

The US Senate of the 79th US Congress did not ratify the Treaty of Manila and the granting of independence until Oct. 22, 1946. How could the US Senate still proceed with the granting of a US territory, independence under the control of unknown anti-American quislings and traitors?

This is Washington DC’s Jekyll and Hyde foreign policy towards the only US territory ever granted dependent-independence. 

Below: “President Roxas was my collaborator during the Japanese occupation, is my collaborator now and will be hereafter.” -Jose P. Laurel, puppet ruler the Japanese. Article: “Puppet Laurel Calls Roxas A Collaborator” Chicago Daily Tribune p.7 Thursday Sept. 5, 1946

“President Roxas was my collaborator during the Japanese occupation, is my collaborator now and will be hereafter.” Jose P. Laurel, puppet ruler the Japanese. – Chicago Daily Tribune Thursday Sept. 5, 1946